Monday, March 24, 2025
" "

Top 5 This Week

" "

Related Posts

California vs Trump: Attorney Gen. Bonta Lays Out “Resistance”PlanBy Antonio‌ ‌Ray‌ ‌Harvey‌ ‌|‌ ‌California‌ ‌Black‌ ‌Media‌

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

During an online conference on Feb. 26, California Attorney General
Rob Bonta detailed how the Trump Administration had used its first five
and half weeks to execute an agenda that runs counter in various ways to
California state policies and priorities.
 
Since taking office, President Donald Trump has issued scores of
executive actions that make good on many of his campaign promises.
Bonta said the impact of Trump’s exercise of his powers is creeping up
on the doorsteps of California’s diverse residents. 
 
“People are scared, worried, anxious, and uncertain about what’s
happening in the federal government. And will it impact their lives and
loved ones,” Bonta said. “Sadly, I think it’s pretty clear that that’s part of
the president’s strategy: To flood the zone, overwhelm us with a barrage
of damaging, dangerous, and illegal executive orders and actions that
impede on the law and values that make America strong.”
 
Bonta made the statement while delivering an address as the guest
speaker of a virtual conference hosted by Capitol Weekly, a non-partisan
publication focused on California politics.
“The Resistance: California vs. Donald Trump.” The 4 ½ hour event
explored Trump’s presidential executive orders, mass firings,
deportations, and billionaire Elon Musk’s handling of the Department of
Government Efficiency (DOGE).
 
One of the directives Trump signed on Jan. 21 bans diversity, equity,
and inclusion (DEI) policies in the federal government and urges the
private sector to follow suit.

Some corporations such as Amazon, Target, and Walmart have
eliminated or scaled back their DEI programs.
 
Bonta had already advised California businesses, nonprofits, and other
entities not to sway from DEI initiatives in their workplaces.
 
“I urge all California businesses not to fall for this scare tactic,” Bonta
stated. 
 
The online conference was held almost three weeks after Gov. Gavin
Newsom signed two bills appropriating $50 million to “Trump Proof”
the state of California. It provides Bonta and the California Department
of Justice (DOJ) funding to file lawsuits against the Trump
Administration as well as protect California laws, institutions, and
policies, Bonta said.
 
The funding is two-fold. First, Senate Bill SBX1-1, authored by Scott
Weiner (D-San Francisco) and Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel (D-
Encino) amends the 2024 Budget Act to include a State Litigation Fund,
distributing $25 million to the DOJ. 
 
SBX1-1 was enacted in case the Trump Administration decides to
withhold funding for emergency aid after a natural disaster such as the
wildfires that occurred in Los Angeles. The DOJ says it intends to go
after the federal government in courts if aid is withheld.  
 
The second bill that was born out of the Special Legislative Session
called by Newsom, SBX1-2, amends the Budget Act to add funding for
Legal Services, including $25 million for legal assistance for
Californians and immigrant communities. 
 
Authored by Weiner and Gabriel, SBX1-2, also allows the DOJ to
provide free legal services for veterans, people with disabilities,

homeless youth, families facing eviction, seniors, victims of domestic
violence, wage theft, and human trafficking.
 
Bonta stated that the funding is sufficient and that his office is staffed to
handle litigation that resists obstructive policies and interference from
the Trump Administration.
The funds would be used “wisely and prudently and efficiently,” Bonta
said. 
 
“I am here to provide facts, reasons, and assurances of California’s
nation-leading protections,” Bonta said. “I am here to enforce our laws,
defend our rights, and protect our people. I am here to ensure progress
prevails in California.”
 
Capitol Weekly hosts quarterly conferences for bipartisan panels to
analyze public policy issues in the state and across the nation.
 
This year’s first conference included over a dozen experts discussing
how California activists and officials can defend policies that oppose
Trump’s injunctions.
 
The first panel focused on health care. The spirited debate featured Beth
Malinowski, SEIU California; Devon Mathis, former California
Assemblymember (R-Porterville); Dr. Richard Pan, former California
Senator; and Amanda McAllister Wallner, Health Access California.
 
The second panel discussed California’s environment and climate. Kip
Lipper, Chief Policy Advisor on Energy and Environment to the Senate
pro-Tem; Catherine Reheis-Boyd, Western States Petroleum
Association; and Victoria Rome from the Natural Resources Defense
Council.
 

The final panel included Sen. María Elena Durazo (D-Los Angeles);
Luis Alvarado, Luis Alvarado Public Affairs; Kevin R. Johnson,
University of California at Davis School of Law; and David Trujillo,
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) California Action. 
 
 “It’s going to take every resident in the state working together to say
‘we’re going to stand up for our neighbors,’” Trujillo said during the
panel discussion.
 
The Trump administration has already begun exerting pressure on
Sanctuary Regions – cities, counties, and states that have passed policies
that shield undocumented individuals from apprehension by U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
 
Trump has threatened to prosecute state and local officials who resist
federal immigration policy. After he was sworn in for his second term,
his administration keyed in on the sanctuary cities across the country.
 
California, with a population of roughly 1.8 million undocumented
immigrants, is clearly on Trump’s radar, the panel acknowledged.
Trujillo said that there is a law that limits the federal government’s
power to force states to enforce immigration laws.
 
“I just want to mention that the 10th Amendment (of the U.S.
Constitution) prevents the federal government from commandeering
states or other cities and counties from law enforcement,” Trujillo said.
“That is the safeguards that we have. I think we have a clear precedent
here (in California). A lot of this is rambling to create fear among our
communities.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles

Enable Notifications OK No thanks